Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'Jews' 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'Jews'
http://zioncrimefactory.com/jew-world-order/


beginExcerpt
History’s most famous critic of Jewry, Adolf Hitler, eloquently explained this Jewish trick in his book, Mein Kampf,

“The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” (A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.)

The mischievous and cruel doctrines of Marx and Hess were zealously adopted by the world’s Jews who saw in it an opportunity to crush the Gentiles once and for all. A Jew named Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl Marx, stated that Communism was — after all — merely a way to transfer all the wealth of the world into Jewish hands and so fulfill the messianic vision of the treacherous Talmud:

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928)

Jewish author Bernard Lazare tells us that Karl Marx was indeed a Talmudist:

“He had that clear Talmudic mind which does not falter at the petty difficulties of fact. He was a Talmudist devoted to sociology and applying his native power of exegesis to the criticism of economic theory. He was inspired by that ancient Hebraic materialism, which, rejecting as too distant and doubtful the hope of an Eden after death, never ceased to dream of Paradise realized on earth. But Marx was not merely a logician, he was also a rebel, an agitator, an acrid controversialist, and he derived his gift for sarcasm and invective, as Heine did, from his Jewish ancestry.” (Lazare, Bernard. “Antisemitism, Its History and Causes”, p. 129)


In its article on “Messianic Movements”, the Encyclopaedia Judaica writes: “In his letters to Leopold Zunz referred many times to the European revolution of 1848 as ‘the Messiah.’ Even many Jews who left the faith tended to invest secular liberation movements with a messianic glow.”

The Jewish supremacist rabbi, Harry Waton, confessed that not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is simply a mechanism for Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews — a fulfillment of the megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud. In his 1939 book, “A Program for The Jews and An Answer To All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity”, the racist rabbi wrote:

“It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us,” (p. 148)

“Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews,” (p. 99)

“Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (p. 100)


Peculiar isn’t it that the supposed arch anti-capitalist, Karl Marx, never spoke a negative word about the Jewish banking dynasty, the Rothschilds, the richest of the world’s capitalist financiers, war profiteers and exploiters of the working class. This isn’t so puzzling when you understand that Marx was working for the Rothschilds all along. (See: Red Symphony) Mikael Bakunin, the prominent anarcho-syndicalist thinker and rival of Karl Marx, assailed Jewish control of the World Revolution, blasting Marx and his phony liberation ideology (Marxism) as a Rothschild-backed con for the Jewish financial oligarchy to undermine, loot and pillage the wealth of Gentile nations. Bakunin said,

“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single gluttonous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which, speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ….” (Michael Bakunin, Polémique contres les Juifs, 1869)
end



Interesting website. Nay, explosive!!

The excerpt above is just the tip of the iceberg. Passages/perspectives from Churchill and D'Israeli are also included. Spawns many intriguing questions, and fits many puzzle pieces.

Is Adolf Hitler a bigger racist/supremacist than Harry Waton, or just a pipsqueak by comparison?

Is Marx worthy of Bakunin's exposition of Marx as less an intellectual and more a Rothschild agent?

Baruch Levy ... does he not sound exactly like one of the founding fathers and contributors to The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion?


More of the iceberg follows below:
beginExcerpt
Chaim Weizmann, the 20th century’s preeminent Zionist influence-peddler, architect of the ‘Balfour Declaration’, and first president of Israel, is quoted as saying: “A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world.” (JEWISH GUARDIAN, Oct. 8, 1920.) Now compare this with the last clause of Protocol No. 11, of The Protocols of Zion: “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.” The remarkable similarity between Weizmann’s pronouncement and the passage from the Protocols proves that the Jewish Learned Elders exist, Weizmann chief among them.

This Hidden Hand of Jews was subtly identified by Walter Rathenau (1867-1922), a German-Jewish industrialist, writer, and statesman who served as Germany’s Foreign Minister during the Weimar Republic. Writing in the Wiener Freie Presse, December 24, 1912, he said: “Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage.” This reality was confirmed by Jean Izoulet, a Jewish professor at the College of France and a member of the Jewish-Masonic secret society Alliance Israelite Universelle. Writing in his 1926 book “Paris Capital of Religions”, Izoulet said: “I certainly do not want to relinquish their Magisterium temporal the three hundred bankers who, at the moment, dominate the world.”
end


In short, the fact of Talmudist-conspiracy is incontrovertible. If one analyzes the available evidence with any degree of honesty and integrity, one can freely label this conspiracy as a Jewish conspiracy without fear of being called an anti-Semite, at least in intellectual circles. Never can tell which way the wind blows in mob circles.

And precisely because the very origin of the word Jew is not what we have been told it is. Nor is Judaism that which we've been told it is. Judea cannot and does not confer Judaism because there were multiple religious sects in Judea at the time of Jesus and no one sect can claim to be the religion of the land. Indeed, Jesus was against the very Pharisees that evolved Talmudism, so he could not have been a Jew in the sense of its meaning today (which is Talmud-believer). Jesus was a Judean. And the real meaning of Jew is a contraction of Judean, and only in this sense can Jesus be a Jew, e.g.in the sense of contraction and not in the sense of a Talmud-believer. Yet the Talmud-believer narrative has unjustly, surreptitiously, and with fiat foundational financing co-opted the true narrative of the meaning of Jew. And therein lies the first major root of the problem; a problem that spawns many many important questions.

What is a Jew?
Short Answer: a person of Judea.

Who are those making fiat declarations of being Jews?
Short Answer: Talmudists not of Judea.

What are these Talmudists up to?
Short Answer: running an organized criminal ring towards FSD under the fiat declaration of being Jews.

Etc.


Pax

ps: I wonder how Chico and Mags will work their magician's smoke to make the logical implications in the long article by Brandon of ZionCrimeFactory.com ... disappear?

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Tue May 06, 2014 8:49 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10859
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
It is insanely hypocritical for Harry Waton to call for "the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society", and then say "Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth." That's because, at this high level of human hierarchy, we are mostly dealing with sociopaths, like Hitler, Marx, Waton, Weizmann, etc.

Are banksters, Zionists, and Talmudists part of the tremendous problem of sociopathy? You bet they are. Are the Jews more to blame than the other religions? Maybe so. There's no doubt that the Jews have often been fingered as the root problem for a very long time. Has that solved the problem? No, because only some Jews are the problem. Which ones? The sociopaths.

To solve the root problem, we have to target the guilty parties, meaning the sociopaths.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue May 06, 2014 10:13 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Your on the right track Zook. Keep researching this narrative and connect the dots until your satisfied.

Quote:
Is Adolf Hitler a bigger racist/supremacist than Harry Waton, or just a pipsqueak by comparison?


There is no reduction in sociopathy with either one of these eugenicist zook.

I think the eugenicist or sociopaths are looking for or already have, deep philosophical belief systems that will prey on our species lack of self knowledge. And I'm sure they know that whatever epistemology they discover, will just create another reactionary opposing view 180 to it, in equal force. And if they could centralize it under one view, better for them. Anything tougher then the United state liberal democrat at this point? Anything tougher then the US political system?

I also wonder how many other religious factions are opposing the "Talmud". Are they more powerful, since they are not identifiable? Is English illuminati under Talmudic control. Vatican? Probably. Are we fighting the original Abrahamic religious wars 10 Thousand years later?

Quote:
What is a Jew?
Short Answer: a person of Judea.

Are you just suggesting a Judas opposing goodness? You cannot just broad stroke an entire race to justify your conclusions here Zook. What type of person would do that? Don't you see that the corruption has entangled our species and sees no culture. Knowing the psychology of evil must take precedence in real time. Knowing the history of conspiracy is knowing the truth.

Quote:
running an organized criminal ring towards FSD under the fiat declaration of being Jews.

So we have the Jews, Christians, and muslims. I kind of see all of them always trying to point out the good deeds they are doing, to a preposterous amount.

Quote:
I wonder how Chico and Mags will work their magician's smoke to make the logical implications in the long article by Brandon of ZionCrimeFactory.com ... disappear?

This should not make your inquiry disappear. Like I have mentioned many times before, please develop a thread on the Talmudic conspiracy. I want to know! I think they have the best attack plan for world control. They have adopted US Politics, Science and Entertainment. Did they forment the American Revolution? Probably. Do they control our Ethics? Our human rights? Apparently as they have hijacked all independent endeavors and made us dependent to a false reality.

A sociopathic reality...

Please continue Zook...

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Tue May 06, 2014 10:38 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 2156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
This ones for mags @ 2:08!


_________________
Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.

QRK: QifUSqn6ygXK61pEkm2g4iBY9ZcLw4g4su
FCK: FettxKyQVhsSURZt1XQxUTypwxEeBbTgUQ

Please visit http://forum.qrk.cc/ for all things Crypto!


Sat May 10, 2014 9:15 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Oh oh, Andy is going to go on a spam tirade with other people telling you how bad AJ is lol. Or is it just because he is a jew?

Whatever it will be, you know its going to be character assassination...

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Sat May 10, 2014 11:04 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
magamud wrote:
Oh oh, Andy is going to go on a spam tirade with other people telling you how bad AJ is lol. Or is it just because he is a jew?

Whatever it will be, you know its going to be character assassination...


To answer the question, Mags, we must first know who/what is a Jew? I mean, if we want to insinuate that AJ is a Jew or is not a Jew, we must first know who/what is a Jew, no?

So ... who/what is a Jew? My research tells me unequivocally that a Jew must have some ancestral connection to the Biblical land of Judea; that Jew is a modern contraction of the ancient term Judea. You agree with this?

Pax

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Sun May 11, 2014 11:38 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10859
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
UncleZook wrote:
My research tells me unequivocally that a Jew must have some ancestral connection to the Biblical land of Judea; that Jew is a modern contraction of the ancient term Judea. You agree with this?

You're being anal, Zook. You are always being anal with your crappy reasoning. The meaning of a word far exceeds its etymology. The word "Jew" can mean a lot of things. It is a loose set of religious beliefs, it is a loose set of physical traits, it is a loose set of cultural practices, it is a loose set of psychological characteristics, etc. It is above all a concept used to communicate ideas. It is not a precise formula with a precise set of operations. By being anal, you don't necessarily reach clarity. Often you arrive at obfuscation and error. In your case, very often.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun May 11, 2014 4:01 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Zook, you must see evil's behaviors of having transcended any race. It is in the core of our species. You would be doing a service if we could just identify people of Greed and disqualify them from power. What is Greed a subset of?

Find ancestral ties to biblical times? Zook most people don't even know their blood lines a 100 years ago. Do you think that is by accident?

Freedom is a very rare commodity, less psychological, less physical! If people are unaware of this fact, it shows in their thinking undoubtedly. Evil is everywhere! These two opposing positions have relations to each other, one must identify the true landscape of reality and describe what it is, to keep alive. Cultivate freedom...

And if you are not cultivating freedom, what are you doing?

Quote:
You agree with this?

I agree we are in a religious war stemming from the sons of Abraham. Evils first manifestation into this world which can be quantifiable by our species scientific lens is sociopathy. Beyond this you are moving into mystical terms such as Satanism, which I am happy to talk about. Going the other way, sociopathy subsets into numerous other human dynamics behavioral and industrial.

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Sun May 11, 2014 4:25 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
UncleZook wrote:
My research tells me unequivocally that a Jew must have some ancestral connection to the Biblical land of Judea; that Jew is a modern contraction of the ancient term Judea. You agree with this?

You're being anal, Zook. You are always being anal with your crappy reasoning. The meaning of a word far exceeds its etymology. The word "Jew" can mean a lot of things. It is a loose set of religious beliefs, it is a loose set of physical traits, it is a loose set of cultural practices, it is a loose set of psychological characteristics, etc. It is above all a concept used to communicate ideas. It is not a precise formula with a precise set of operations. By being anal, you don't necessarily reach clarity. Often you arrive at obfuscation and error. In your case, very often.


I see that you're pushing uncertainty, distortion, confusion, etc. ... yet again in the presence of specific detail. But we already defined such behavior as an attack against the truth. Chico attacking the truth ... so what else is new?

Reality check: the meaning of a word that's been used to illegally displace one peoples and replace them with another peoples ... and illegally displace native territorial rights with alien territorial rights ... requires turning back to the original meaning of the word, not the most recent flux in meaning.

To wit, who has the birthright to be a Jew, not merely the naturalized right of being a Jew?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/naturalized
beginExcerpt
nat·u·ral·ize (năch′ər-ə-līz′, năch′rə-)
v. nat·u·ral·ized, nat·u·ral·iz·ing, nat·u·ral·iz·es
v.tr.
1. To grant full citizenship to (one of foreign birth).
2. To adopt (something foreign) into general use.
3. To adapt or acclimate (a plant or animal) to a new environment; introduce and establish as if native.
4. To cause to conform to nature.
end


I, a brown man with a Hindu religious and cultural background - from South India - can declare myself to be a Muslim any time I choose. But no one would take me seriously - nor should - if I then claimed territorial rights on a chunk of Riyadh based on my conversion to Islam. They shouldn't even take me seriously if I claimed territorial rights on a chunk of New Delhi, in North India. Nor should they take me seriously if I claimed to be an Arab. Being Muslim is not synonymous with being Arab. Likewise, being a self-styled Jew (as per Benjamin Freedman's definition) is not synonymous with being a Judean. Self-styled Jews have no rights in Biblical Judea. Not a one. For self-styled Jews are not Judeans and never were. Real Jews, as Freedman correctly argues, must have some connection to Judea. Lacking this connection, they are not real Jews.

Having demonstrated that they are not Jews/Judeans in the territorial sense ... we shift to the their claim of being Jews in the religious sense. But that, too, is suspect; for there is no real religion called Judaism. Judea had multiple religious sects inside its borders (Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes, etc.). These sects had little in
common with each other. I mean we can legitimately bring Catholics and Protestants under a bigger tent called Christianity, due to the many features that both sects share, including the common teachings and worship of Jesus. But the religious sects of Judea did not share much with each other (at least from what I know).

So it is correct to categorize religious worship that existed in Judea in Jesus's time in any one of the following manners: Pharisaism, Saducceism, Essenesism, etc. Calling any one of these sects (or their derivatives), Judaism, does not tell us which sect is being referred to. IOW, it's similar to a function/procedure/subroutine with one input and multiple outputs. And that is an illogical design construct. There has to be 1-to-1 correspondence between input and output to have a logical coinage of meaning. In short, there is no such original meaning as Judaism in the religious sense; from this, it follows that there is no meaningful derivative called Judaism in the religious sense.

Judaism simply had never existed as a religion, not in Biblical Judea. So there is no derivative to speak of. In short, no modern religion can legitimately call itself Judaism. Granted, any newly minted modern religion can still call itself Judaism as a marketing ploy; but then, it can call itself BinnyBinny and have the same degree of connection to Biblical Judea. Zero and zilch.

Now, Pharisaism had once existed as a sect in BIblical Judea ... and has since fluxed into the modern religion we can legitimately call Talmudism (with a Babylonian basis). Sadducceism and Essenesism had also existed in Biblical Judea. You can do your own research and find out if they still exist today in any form. In any event, religious sects once existing in or deriving from Biblical Judea are Judaic sects; they do not constitute a Judaic religion (in the sense that Catholicism and Protestantism constitute Christianity). The implication of this is subtle but very important, namely, that there is no such religion called Judaism ... only disparate Judaic sects (referenced as Judaic only because they hail from Biblical Judea, and not because of spiritual kinship with each other).

Get it, Cupid?


Pax

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Sun May 11, 2014 5:14 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10859
Reply with quote
Post Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
UncleZook wrote:
I see that you're pushing uncertainty, distortion, confusion, etc. ... yet again in the presence of specific detail. But we already defined such behavior as an attack against the truth. Chico attacking the truth ... so what else is new?

And you push, with certainty, untruths. Do you think that is not an attack on the truth?

Note that you are the one defining uncertainty as an attack on the truth, not we. Uncertainty does not attack the truth. It simply admits that we don't hold "the whole truth and nothing but the truth".

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” ― Socrates

UncleZook wrote:
But no one would take me seriously - nor should - if I then claimed territorial rights on a chunk of Riyadh based on my conversion to Islam. They shouldn't even take me seriously if I claimed territorial rights on a chunk of New Delhi, in North India. Nor should they take me seriously if I claimed to be an Arab.

Don't worry, no one is taking you seriously. With all the hot air you expel on defining a Jew, how can we? You may as well define how many angels can dance on a pin head.

UncleZook wrote:
Get it, Cupid?

Oh yeah. More than you realize.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun May 11, 2014 6:37 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.