united-people.tk
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/

Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'Jews'
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=1126		 Page 3 of 3
Author:  andywight [ Sun May 11, 2014 9:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Chicodoodoo wrote:
And shouldn't you also thank me for pointing out the incredible similarity between your behavior and that of the Black Knight?

I'm not surprised you missed the whole point of my last post, but now you're begging me for praise? You really are a nut job aren't you Chicodoodoo!
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon May 12, 2014 8:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
andywight wrote:
I'm not surprised you missed the whole point of my last post, but now you're begging me for praise? You really are a nut job aren't you Chicodoodoo!

There's a good example of character assassination, Andy. But then, you know that. You will deny the evidence in every instance. It's the way sociopaths play the game. That's how you expose yourself without even realizing it. You think you are being clever, but you are just being a sociopath.
Author:  andywight [ Mon May 12, 2014 11:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Chicodoodoo wrote:
There's a good example of character assassination, Andy. But then, you know that. You will deny the evidence in every instance. It's the way sociopaths play the game. That's how you expose yourself without even realizing it. You think you are being clever, but you are just being a sociopath.

Your credibility is pretty much non-existent at this stage Chicodoodoo, but I would suggest that if you want to regain some it's probably not wise to criticize members for "character assassination" and then "character assassinate" them in the same post! :D
Author:  UncleZook [ Mon May 12, 2014 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Chicodoodoo wrote:
It is insanely hypocritical for Harry Waton to call for "the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society", and then say "Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth." That's because, at this high level of human hierarchy, we are mostly dealing with sociopaths, like Hitler, Marx, Waton, Weizmann, etc.

Are banksters, Zionists, and Talmudists part of the tremendous problem of sociopathy? You bet they are. Are the Jews more to blame than the other religions? Maybe so.


We should dispense with the term Jews, altogether. The word has been much abused and can now only lead to more confusion. But if you still insist on using/abusing the term - and if clarity is your pursuit, as it should be - then I must insist that you clarify its meaning.

What /who is a Jew? This is a question of utmost importance if we want to understand both the alleged agenda of the so-called Jews ... and equally, the alleged persecution of the so-called Jews.

Quote:
There's no doubt that the Jews have often been fingered as the root problem for a very long time. Has that solved the problem? No, because only some Jews are the problem. Which ones? The sociopaths.


Again, we must understand who/what is a Jew ... before we attempt to understand if some, many, or all of so-called Jews are the problem. There is no rational basis for attempting to answer these questions out of sequence.

Secondly, neither generalized sociopathy nor randomized independent sociopaths are pushing for FSD. On the contrary, this push is exclusive to specific, secretive, counterfeit-tokens financed, interdependent organized sociopaths. Organelles, organs, organisms, organic systems, organizations, etc.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/organism

beginExcerpt
or·gan·ism
[awr-guh-niz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
1.
a form of life composed of mutually interdependent parts that maintain various vital processes.
2.
a form of life considered as an entity; an animal, plant, fungus, protistan, or moneran.
3.
any organized body or system conceived of as analogous to a living being: the governmental organism.
4.
any complex thing or system having properties and functions determined not only by the properties and relations of its individual parts, but by the character of the whole that they compose and by the relations of the parts to the whole.
end


The task then is to identify the organized sociopaths pushing for FSD from the much larger available pool of sociopaths. Lumping the culpable sociopaths together with the sociopaths that are not culpable (e.g. in the push for FSD) ... is tantamount to hiding the guilty among the innocent, which results in lifting suspicion off the few that are guilty and loading it on the many that are innocent.

The pursuit of general sociopathy in the presence of specific detail (e.g. specific organized sociopaths pushing for FSD) is a calculated one designed to hide the criminals and, simultaneously, deride the innocent bystanders. With that in mind, being a sociopath is not a crime; OTOH, being an organized sociopath in the duty of FSD is nothing less than a crime against humanity. Know the difference and join the league of genuine truthseekers.
Or keep bond with the FSD criminal enterprise and its propaganda mill of pyrite philosophers.

Quote:
To solve the root problem, we have to target the guilty parties, meaning the sociopaths.


Meaning the specific organized sociopaths.

Once more, targeting general sociopathy in the presence of specific details is an attack against the truth.


Pax
Author:  andywight [ Sat May 17, 2014 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Passages from disparate hist. figures on the topic of 'J
Page 3 of 3 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/