Will the real history please stand up?
Page 7 of 9

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

Thousands of government papers detailing some of the most controversial episodes in 20th-century British history have vanished after civil servants removed them from the country’s National Archives and then reported them as lost.

Documents concerning the Falklands war, Northern Ireland’s Troubles and the infamous Zinoviev letter – in which MI6 officers plotted to bring about the downfall of the first Labour government - are all said to have been misplaced.

Other missing files concern the British colonial administration in Palestine, tests on polio vaccines and long-running territorial disputes between the UK and Argentina. -- source

The real history can't stand up when it is being actively erased!

Real historians like David Irving and Vincent Reynouard get their information from these very source documents that are being quietly purged. Don't forget that the Oklahoma City bombing of the Murrah Federal Building was also a psy-op to destroy historical documents.

The bottom line is that the ruling sociopaths that conspire to create all of humanity's misfortunes that they profit from use every method they can think of to cover up their crimes. Naturally, that includes everything from destroying the real historical evidence to fabricating false historical evidence.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

"You ask where the records for the Office of Censorship are, and the answer is in the National Archives under seal for perpetuity. President Truman at the end of WW2 issued an Executive Order that the records were to be kept sealed in perpetuity. No one was to be allowed to see the actual transcripts." -- David Irving, video below at 41:43

This is how criminal activity is hidden. There is no other reason for sealing these historical records of WW2, or even worse, sealing them forever. The nature of the crime must be horrendous and unambiguous, given the length of the protection.

There is plenty of evidence presented in this forum that the biggest war crimes of WW2 were committed by the Allies, specifically Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, and not by Hitler and the Nazis. Hitler fought according to the rules of war agreed upon at the time, until he was forced into a "tit for tat" response by the criminal actions of his enemies. That the Allies must hide their crimes forever speak volumes about their true nature. So does the fact that they had to create the outrageous Holocaust Lie, falsely accusing the Nazis of an enormous genocide that never happened.

Exposing Winston Churchill

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

General Patton was murdered by elements within his own government.

This treason is enough to reveal the true face of the U.S. government to the American public, but the public is deliberately kept in the dark.

That General Patton was killed is now fairly well established. There had always been a suspicion that he was murdered, but a book "Target: Patton: The Plot to Assassinate General George S. Patton", published in 2008, reveals this with hardly a doubt. Interestingly Wilcox's book was greeted with silence by the US media. ... So much for the integrity of the mainstream US media, a propaganda organ of the Elite.

The author Robert Wilcox was able to repeatedly interview an OSS agent, a decorated marksman named Douglass Bazata, who admitted to having arranged the "accident". In this accident no one except General Patton was hurt, and once the accident had taken place, Bazata claimed to have shot General Patton with a neck breaking low velocity projectile. Bazata passed away in 1999. According to Bazata the job was finished by the Soviet NKVD (the precursor of KGB) while Patton was in hospital. Whether it was the OSS, or the OSS-NKVD acting jointly that completed the murder of Gen. Patton as Wilcox indicates, the fact is, as we point out, both, the US and the Soviet Union, were controlled by the same Elite. It was the Elite that wanted to kill Patton. -- source

The special-ops assassin even arranged for a highly public admission of his role in the assassination, but it was also not reported to the American public.

"For diverse political reasons, many extremely high-ranking persons hated Patton. I know who killed him for I was the one who was hired to do it. Ten thousand dollars. General William J. 'Wild Bill' Donovan himself, Director of OSS, entrusted me with the mission. I set up the 'accident'. Since he didn't die in the accident, he was kept in isolation in the hospital, where he was killed with a cyanide injection." -- Douglass Bazata (source)

It was good versus evil again, and evil won, as usual.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

Prominent North Koreans who were believed to have been executed under the orders of Kim Jong-un have mysteriously reappeared in Pyongyang’s public circles. The despot leader has been known to execute North Koreans who oppose him or who have fallen out of favour with his regime – but not all is now it appears. --

Why am I not surprised? Because the Western press is a well-oiled propaganda machine far beyond anything the Nazis were falsely claimed to run. The Allied claims that the Nazis were masters of propaganda was just, well, masterful propaganda. And that propaganda is still being reinforced today, over 70 years later! There is no chance the media will change its tune now.

Kim Jong-un’s ex-girlfriend Hyon Song-wol was believed to have been executed along with a dozen well-known performers by firing squad in 2013, according to Chinese sources.

The reports said the pop star as well as Mun Kyong-jin, head of the Unhasu Orchestra, were arrested on August 17 for violating North Korean laws against pornography and were executed three days later.

However in 2014 Hyon Song-wol was spotted alive and well on TV in 2014 and most recently the pop star was photographed as she arrived to inspect the Olympic venues – where North Korea is sending a 140-strong art troupe – in South Korea ahead of the Winter Games.

Military chief Ri Yong Gil was also reported to have been executed in 2016 for “factionalism, misuse of authority, and corruption”.

South Korean intelligence officials believed Ri Yong Gil was killed after he was disposed from his position as head of the North Korean army.

But just months later he resurfaced at Workers’ Party Congress in May with an array of new senior-level positions.

Kim Jong-un’s aunt Kim Kyong-hui was reportedly executed by poisoning according to a North Korea defector, who spoke to Western media.

However, these reports turned out to be false after South Korea officials revealed that Kim Kyong-hui – who is the sister of Kim Jong-un’s father – was very much alive but was being treated for various illnesses. --

This is the way it is for most news in the West. It is fake news! And the news that the alternate media disseminates fake news is fake news too! The primary purveyor of fake news is the western media, and when they tell you otherwise, don't believe them. Look at all the garbage they feed us about Kim Jong-un!

The above quotes are from the British newspaper Daily Express, so you should question them as well. That's how hard it is to get to the truth. We have liars occasionally reminding us that they lie. Can we believe them, or not?

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

Prof. Lipstadt, who has made an career out of stigmatizing anyone who doubts any aspect of the “Holocaust” narrative, as a diabolic “Holocaust denier,” is free to deny, without negative consequences, the holocaust in Dresden, because of her exceptional status as one of the Holy People. She may do as she likes with history, in ways that the rest of us may not. For that reason alone we cannot respect the religion of Holocaustianity. It is not history. It is a product of Talmudic megalomania. Few of us tolerate fanatical egoism from Catholics, Protestants or Muslims. The very idea raises our secular indignation and “Separation of Church (or Mosque) and State!” is our cry, in the face of it. But to shout “Separation of Synagogue and State!” in nations where Holocaustianity is the last truly believed state religion in the otherwise agnostic West, would be unthinkable for anyone who valued their reputation, employment, personal safety, or in Europe, freedom from incarceration.

We've encountered "Professor" Lipstadt before here (the glamorized Hollywood version), and Michael Hoffman here. Michael Hoffman makes a great point about Jewish hypocrisy when it comes to history. Will the real history please stand up? Not when Jews can pass laws making it a crime.

You can hear the real Lipstadt make her pitch here. The Holocaust story is undeniable in her view, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar. That would be me. And David Irving, David Duke, Vincent Reynouard, Sorbonne Professor Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, and many others.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

You can hear the real Lipstadt make her pitch here.

Lipstadt is the epitome of the Jewish con-artist. She has to know she is lying. For example, her "proof" that the Holocaust is real because the Nazi perpetrators admitted to it is unconscionable. Those that "admitted to it" did so because they were tortured by the Allies. Those that were not tortured spoke truthfully that they had no knowledge of any such Jewish genocide, and many stated that they didn't believe it was true. Yet Lipstadt simply pretends such information is revisionist lies. To Lipstadt, they are not facts, and cannot be facts, because the Holocaust is undeniable.

And she calls herself a historian...

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

David Irving is a real historian, unlike Deborah Lipstadt, who is a Jewish story-teller pretending to be a historian. David Irving is also a historical revisionist, working hard to replace the victor's version of history, which is typically pure propaganda, with what really happened based on the actual evidence. This makes him a liar in Lipstadt's book, which does not allow for any changes to Jewish history. The only way to stop Irving's message is to kill the messenger. That is done by discrediting the messenger by painting him as a liar. This is the method the Jews use against historical revisionists. They are masters of the smear campaign.

But is David Irving really a liar? Judge for yourself. Listen to him speak of the intensive research he has done, and the startling evidence he has uncovered. He does this in casual conversation, without any notes or preparation, because he is sincere and genuine. He's not a con-artist like Lipstadt. He's the real deal, a real historian, interested only in the truth.

David Irving Discusses Rudolf Hess - November, 2013 - Part I
(duration 30:16)

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

The mainstream media, owned by Jews, fully supports Lipstadt and her campaign against Holocaust deniers, historical revisionists, anti-Semites, and purveyors of hate speech (i.e. truth-seekers). She gets positive press and accolades for winning her court case against David Irving, which she twists into a proof that the Holocaust was real (how absurd). What is not mentioned is the enormous amount of Jewish money that poured into her defense fund, while the other side consisted only of David Irving, who was representing himself on his own dime. You see, the Jews understood how important it was to their Holocaust deception to persecute the leading opposition voices. By hook or by crook, they had to win. Can you see the sociopathy?

“In the mid-’70s the deniers changed their M.O. and they did something, which is not uncommon among conspiracy theorists today and among extremist groups today, where they still held the same beliefs as before, but their outer presentation became much more academic-like,” she explains. “They began to publish books with footnotes. They began to hold conferences. They began to show up on television where they were often given a voice. But instead of looking like neo-Nazis, dressed in stormtrooper uniforms, they began to talk in a very measured way about how the documents showed that [the Holocaust] was impossible.” -- Deborah Lipstadt (source)

Attack the messenger, ignore the message. Lipstadt knows how to play the game. All sociopaths do.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

The real history of what we call prehistory (before written records) is also being suppressed and controlled. Why? Because sociopaths consider knowledge to be power, and this is how they maintain power and control over the bulk of humanity. They do not share knowledge. Instead, they hoard it, monopolize it, and keep it secret. It is quite amazing how this behavior manifests itself. You can see it in the suppression of work that has been done to understand the true history of New Zealand.

"Under the Carpet" New Zealand Ancient History Documentary
(duration 57:42)

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Will the real history please stand up?

First and foremost, as long-since declassified U.S. Intelligence documents and long-since opened Soviet archives have completely confirmed, Joe McCarthy was not a "witch-hunter". Indeed, even many liberal historians have had to readjust their positions regarding what we now know was a substantial penetration of the U.S. government by Communist subversives (originally aided and abetted by FDR) . The overall subject is too vast to adequately cover in this piece. Highly recommended and authoritative books on the matter are 'The Venona Intercepts' by Eric Breindel; and 'Blacklisted by History' by M. Stanton Evans. -- source

Everything we've been taught about Joe McCarthy comes from the controlled media. Now that we know that FDR was a sneaky traitor of the highest order (Pearl Harbor) and a puppet to the Jewish sociopath cartel, we have to re-examine our brainwashing concerning McCarthy. After all the media, which was instrumental in undermining McCarthy, is also controlled by the Jewish sociopath cartel. So would that Jewish cartel be interested in vilifying McCarthy as it did Hitler and the Nazis? Wasn't the Russian revolution and Communism orchestrated by that very same Jewish sociopath cartel? Indeed it was, so why would that cartel want to see McCarthy successfully reveal the Communist sympathizers (i.e. the Jewish sociopath cartel sympathizers) in the U.S. government?

They wouldn't, so they smeared him in the media, their most powerful instrument of destruction.

All throughout the Army-McCarthy hearings - which really scared the phony "anti-Communist" President / ex-General Eisenhower - the press smeared McCarthy and misrepresented all the testimonies. -- source

Keep in mind that Eisenhower was known as the "Swedish Jew" at the West Point military academy. No wonder FDR picked him to be the commander of the American military forces during WW2, blitz-promoting him over far more qualified military officers (who weren't Jews).

These two "good ol' boys" go way back to the same Semitic tribe, as did FDR's most influential advisers.

Page 7 of 9 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group