united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Will the real history please stand up? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=842 |
Page 7 of 10 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:01 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
The real history can't stand up when it is being actively erased! Real historians like David Irving and Vincent Reynouard get their information from these very source documents that are being quietly purged. Don't forget that the Oklahoma City bombing of the Murrah Federal Building was also a psy-op to destroy historical documents. The bottom line is that the ruling sociopaths that conspire to create all of humanity's misfortunes that they profit from use every method they can think of to cover up their crimes. Naturally, that includes everything from destroying the real historical evidence to fabricating false historical evidence. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:33 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
This is how criminal activity is hidden. There is no other reason for sealing these historical records of WW2, or even worse, sealing them forever. The nature of the crime must be horrendous and unambiguous, given the length of the protection. There is plenty of evidence presented in this forum that the biggest war crimes of WW2 were committed by the Allies, specifically Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, and not by Hitler and the Nazis. Hitler fought according to the rules of war agreed upon at the time, until he was forced into a "tit for tat" response by the criminal actions of his enemies. That the Allies must hide their crimes forever speak volumes about their true nature. So does the fact that they had to create the outrageous Holocaust Lie, falsely accusing the Nazis of an enormous genocide that never happened. Exposing Winston Churchill |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:24 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This treason is enough to reveal the true face of the U.S. government to the American public, but the public is deliberately kept in the dark.
The special-ops assassin even arranged for a highly public admission of his role in the assassination, but it was also not reported to the American public.
It was good versus evil again, and evil won, as usual. Patton Assassination -- MyServicePride INTV w Tim Wilcox (duration 8:39) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:01 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | ||||||||||||||||||
Why am I not surprised? Because the Western press is a well-oiled propaganda machine far beyond anything the Nazis were falsely claimed to run. The Allied claims that the Nazis were masters of propaganda was just, well, masterful propaganda. And that propaganda is still being reinforced today, over 70 years later! There is no chance the media will change its tune now.
This is the way it is for most news in the West. It is fake news! And the news that the alternate media disseminates fake news is fake news too! The primary purveyor of fake news is the western media, and when they tell you otherwise, don't believe them. Look at all the garbage they feed us about Kim Jong-un! The above quotes are from the British newspaper Daily Express, so you should question them as well. That's how hard it is to get to the truth. We have liars occasionally reminding us that they lie. Can we believe them, or not? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:22 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
We've encountered "Professor" Lipstadt before here (the glamorized Hollywood version), and Michael Hoffman here. Michael Hoffman makes a great point about Jewish hypocrisy when it comes to history. Will the real history please stand up? Not when Jews can pass laws making it a crime. You can hear the real Lipstadt make her pitch here. The Holocaust story is undeniable in her view, and anyone who says otherwise is a liar. That would be me. And David Irving, David Duke, Vincent Reynouard, Sorbonne Professor Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, and many others. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:41 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
Lipstadt is the epitome of the Jewish con-artist. She has to know she is lying. For example, her "proof" that the Holocaust is real because the Nazi perpetrators admitted to it is unconscionable. Those that "admitted to it" did so because they were tortured by the Allies. Those that were not tortured spoke truthfully that they had no knowledge of any such Jewish genocide, and many stated that they didn't believe it was true. Yet Lipstadt simply pretends such information is revisionist lies. To Lipstadt, they are not facts, and cannot be facts, because the Holocaust is undeniable. And she calls herself a historian... |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? |
David Irving is a real historian, unlike Deborah Lipstadt, who is a Jewish story-teller pretending to be a historian. David Irving is also a historical revisionist, working hard to replace the victor's version of history, which is typically pure propaganda, with what really happened based on the actual evidence. This makes him a liar in Lipstadt's book, which does not allow for any changes to Jewish history. The only way to stop Irving's message is to kill the messenger. That is done by discrediting the messenger by painting him as a liar. This is the method the Jews use against historical revisionists. They are masters of the smear campaign. But is David Irving really a liar? Judge for yourself. Listen to him speak of the intensive research he has done, and the startling evidence he has uncovered. He does this in casual conversation, without any notes or preparation, because he is sincere and genuine. He's not a con-artist like Lipstadt. He's the real deal, a real historian, interested only in the truth. David Irving Discusses Rudolf Hess - November, 2013 - Part I (duration 30:16) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:35 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
The mainstream media, owned by Jews, fully supports Lipstadt and her campaign against Holocaust deniers, historical revisionists, anti-Semites, and purveyors of hate speech (i.e. truth-seekers). She gets positive press and accolades for winning her court case against David Irving, which she twists into a proof that the Holocaust was real (how absurd). What is not mentioned is the enormous amount of Jewish money that poured into her defense fund, while the other side consisted only of David Irving, who was representing himself on his own dime. You see, the Jews understood how important it was to their Holocaust deception to persecute the leading opposition voices. By hook or by crook, they had to win. Can you see the sociopathy?
Attack the messenger, ignore the message. Lipstadt knows how to play the game. All sociopaths do. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? |
The real history of what we call prehistory (before written records) is also being suppressed and controlled. Why? Because sociopaths consider knowledge to be power, and this is how they maintain power and control over the bulk of humanity. They do not share knowledge. Instead, they hoard it, monopolize it, and keep it secret. It is quite amazing how this behavior manifests itself. You can see it in the suppression of work that has been done to understand the true history of New Zealand. "Under the Carpet" New Zealand Ancient History Documentary (duration 57:42) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:51 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | ||||||||||||||||||
Everything we've been taught about Joe McCarthy comes from the controlled media. Now that we know that FDR was a sneaky traitor of the highest order (Pearl Harbor) and a puppet to the Jewish sociopath cartel, we have to re-examine our brainwashing concerning McCarthy. After all the media, which was instrumental in undermining McCarthy, is also controlled by the Jewish sociopath cartel. So would that Jewish cartel be interested in vilifying McCarthy as it did Hitler and the Nazis? Wasn't the Russian revolution and Communism orchestrated by that very same Jewish sociopath cartel? Indeed it was, so why would that cartel want to see McCarthy successfully reveal the Communist sympathizers (i.e. the Jewish sociopath cartel sympathizers) in the U.S. government? They wouldn't, so they smeared him in the media, their most powerful instrument of destruction.
Keep in mind that Eisenhower was known as the "Swedish Jew" at the West Point military academy. No wonder FDR picked him to be the commander of the American military forces during WW2, blitz-promoting him over far more qualified military officers (who weren't Jews). These two "good ol' boys" go way back to the same Semitic tribe, as did FDR's most influential advisers. |
Page 7 of 10 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |