united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Will the real history please stand up? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=842 |
Page 4 of 10 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:33 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | ||||||||||||||||||
About 2000 years ago, the Roman empire was setting the example that the United States/Israel/Rothschild empire would be so keen to copy two millennia later. The Roman empire was corrupt beyond belief, with psychological deviants of a sociopathic nature, like the emperor Caligula, wreaking havoc throughout the realm. Caligula was killed off after four short years as emperor, and Claudius replaced him, with his very young wife Messalina in tow.
Whether this is the real history or not, it has the unmistakeable sign of organized sociopaths at the helm, just like the world we live in currently.
Some things, like sociopathic techniques for gaining power and control, just don't seem to change. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:25 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
We are talking the beginning of World War II here. You remember the history you were taught about how the big bad wolf (Hitler) just invaded all the neighboring countries like a spoiled brat, right?
So is it the history books that are lying, or is it the New York Times newspaper? Or both? The history books are written long after the fact by the victors. The newspapers don't have quite the same luxury. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed May 13, 2015 6:26 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
Most of us in the forum world know about President Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 farewell speech wherein he describes the dangers we face from the "military-industrial complex". That's quite the admission coming from a World War II five-star general. I've read Eisenhower's children claim that some drafts referred to the "military-industrial-congressional" complex, but it was changed before the final speech to avoid irritating members of Congress. That's politics for you. Few, however, know of his closing remarks, which strike me, like his "military-industrial complex" warning, as genuine and very unsociopathic. One wonders how a non-sociopath can become a war-time four-star general and President of the United States, which seems nigh impossible today. I didn't know that both Dwight's brother Milton and Dwight's son John were both part of the President's "inner circle", and that at least Milton had significant input and influence on the text of the speech. Perhaps the fact that the speech was very much a group effort crafted over a long period of time (two years) helped enhance its humanity. Yet this is the man supposedly behind the appalling treatment of hundreds of thousands of surrendering German soldiers who were allowed to die in open-air concentration camps with little to no food and no shelter. Was this the same war criminal addressing the nation in January 1961? Were the Germans hung at the Nuremberg Trials just as guilty, or just as innocent, as Eisenhower? Were they just as sociopathic, or non-sociopathic, as Eisenhower? No ruling sociopath today would deliver a genuine appeal like Eisenhower apparently did in his farewell message to America and the world. Here's what he said:
|
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed May 13, 2015 7:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? |
Snopes claims Eisenhower's criminal treatment of German POWs is just an "Urban Legend" and points to Wikipedia (HA!) as evidence. Other sources disagree ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ). Do I believe "respected authorities" like Snopes and Wikipedia? Hell no. |
Author: | magamud [ Sun May 17, 2015 6:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? |
There is no history, just the consequences of being deceived. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 17, 2015 7:33 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
Exactly my point, expressed in a digital fashion, whereas I prefer the more accommodating analog perspective. To visualize that, think of a sine wave compared to a square wave. The sine wave is analog, the square wave is digital. |
Author: | magamud [ Mon May 18, 2015 8:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? |
No doubt in my mind how analog and digital could be used to influence human behavior. The analog is a much close vibration to nature where as digital reminds me of TV programming. A programmed mind is compartmentalized. Multiple identities that don't know each other. In order to maintain this house of cards one needs to take huge leaps of logic to keep it together. Black and white thinking, behaviors of a con man, an uneasy feeling. The electrical energy of digital spread over time can be quite something along with other programming constructs perpetuating the same matrix. To keep this lie going, the engineers must support our hierarchy of needs. In this way its much easier to direct the subject. Then you could get into trauma based programming etc... I see evidence of black and white thinking everywhere. It would explain much of the disease and disconnection of our society. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue May 19, 2015 3:27 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
Exactly. Now consider how certainty figures into this. With black and white thinking, something is either black or white. The choice is binary, so I also call it binary thinking. If something is not black, then it must be white. Logic tells you that this is a certainty. Yet what you are certain of can easily be untrue, because the underlying premise (something is either black or white) was never true to begin with. The world is analog, and there are an infinite number of shades of gray, not to mention an infinite number of other colors. The world is more complex than the human brain can handle, so the mind simplifies things, sacrificing accuracy (truth) in the process. Sociopaths use this to their advantage. It is the bedrock of their success at deceiving and manipulating others. They guide their victims into n-level thinking, where n = 2 for binary thinking, but can be 3, 4, or more to either generate certainty or confusion, whichever best serves the sociopath in selling the con. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri May 29, 2015 7:43 am ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right, and that is because organized sociopaths run amok, unidentified and unmanaged. Here is an example:
Honor is the wrong word. There is honor among thieves, and among organized sociopaths. But there is no empathy, no genuineness, no transparency, and no equality.
Didn't I always say, "It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth."
Yes, that is the classic mistake non-sociopaths make -- they project their morality and normality onto the very con-artists who deceive them.
So true. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jun 29, 2015 2:21 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Will the real history please stand up? | |||||||||
Oh yes there is! It's that we don't know squat! We think we are so smart and have so much knowledge, but that is not the case at all. We don't even know what really happened on 9/11, even though the official version is already cast in ink in the history books. 9/11 was only 14 years ago, and we don't even have that history accurately recorded! Same thing for the Holocaust, which was only 70 years ago. How can we really know what happened 2000 years ago? So should it come as a surprise that we don't know squat about what happened 150,000 years ago? Somebody was installing some rather sophisticated plumbing in a massive pyramid. Who? Why? How? Maybe some of you out there will recall the post where I wrote about the discovery of the purpose of the strange underground chambers found below the Great Pyramid in Giza. That too was plumbing. A great deal of misinformation is apparently being sent through the pipes to keep us dazed and confused. Shouldn't we wonder who is doing this, and how it is done, and why? |
Page 4 of 10 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |