united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Spotlight on betrayal https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=169 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Spotlight on betrayal |
Good post, Mags. Effectively, they are increasing the dosage of the poisons they allow themselves to feed us. Why would they say it's OK for us to consume 30 times more glyphosate now than before? Are they trying to make us die faster, without attracting attention? Duh! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri May 24, 2019 9:10 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Spotlight on betrayal | |||||||||
Censorship is betrayal. So is deceptive information / propaganda, like Russiagate. Here's an interesting person who reminds me of me. His name is Michael Krieger and his website is Liberty Blitzkrieg. Reading the About and Welcome web pages there felt like déja vu for me, as it mirrored in many ways my own journey away from mind control and brainwashing. Michael Krieger wrote piece a month ago about Russiagate / censorship and talked about it with James Corbett on The Corbett Report (video below). Russiagate is Dead...But Online Censorship is Alive and Well. (duration 19:39) I discovered Michael Krieger just yesterday via his article Direct Democracy' Is The Future Of Human Governance - Part 1, which was listed on Rense.com. I have long been an advocate for the same thing, which I tend to call self-representation, which basically means doing away with Congressional representatives and simply representing ourselves directly via the Internet. Last night I e-mailed Michael laying out my reasons why what he calls Direct Democracy won't work (which is why self-representation won't work either). I only just made the connection between the four major psychological groups that I laid out in How the World Works and why Michael's Direct Democracy cannot succeed in this psychological environment. I figured if anyone could prove me wrong, Michael could, so I wanted to give him the opportunity. I hope I will be able to report on his counter-arguments soon. Here is the e-mail I sent using his Contact web page.
Yes, I immediately criticized his policy of giving priority attention to e-mails from financial supporters of his website, which is not very diplomatic of me, but I am hoping he is enough like me to prefer a no-nonsense, direct approach without regard to his ego being bruised. I risk having him ignore my e-mail, but that will give me an indication of his true levels of genuineness and integrity. We shall see. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |