 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Chicodoodoo wrote:
To a family that lost a loved one in the WTC, 9/11 is more relevant. To a family that lost a loved one in East Timor, Timor is more relevant. Relevance is relevant. |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
A telling example of prevarication. I asked for relevancy in today's landscape, implying global politics ...
and Chico returns by comparing the global impact and ongoing currency of 9/11/2001 to the local impact and expired currency of East Timor.
Relevance is relevant? C'mon, Chico ... you can do better than Stonewall Clinton.
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
You are too easily stunned. The key word is "obvious". Obviousness is relative, too. You and I both know 9/11 was a criminal, murderous, false-flag, psychological operation. However, there was a time during and after 9/11 when I didn't know that. If the facts had been obvious to me, that would not have happened. But it did happen, and it is still happening to many uninformed and uneducated Americans. |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
To anyone studying the case, the facts are obvious.
To anyone playing the ostrich on the beach, only their inner fears and personal cowardice is obvious.
In 2012, there is no excuse for not looking at the case of 9/11/2001 and its obvious facts and conclusions.
When it is stated that the facts are obvious, that necessarily implies the case is being looked at ... not that the ostrich is looking for clams in the sand.
Yet another example of your many prevarications, Chico.
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Actually, the thought doesn't cross my mind. My integrity is an open book. You are welcome to assassinate my character to your heart's content, but it conflicts with your self-assessment of being a truth-seeker. |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
Please don't confuse exposition of someone's character (by their own actions) ... with character assassination.
I am exposing your character by exposing your behavior: assumptions to conclusions; proactive tampers; support and protection for the band of proactive tampers that has settled here at UP (e.g. by promoting them in the hidden capstone); patience for trivial pursuits (e.g. lateral attacks on alternative media) and impatience with global truths (e.g. Assange, Fisk, Pilger's gatekeeping for the power pyramid via reference to 9/11/2001 as an imagined or false conspiracy); oblique attacks against the arguments of genuine truthseekers and avoidance of any direct discussion of the facts; administrative hijinx to reset unsatisfactory poll results; prevarication; etc.
If that is character assassination, so be it. But the factual record of your behavior is here for all to see. Your integrity is a comic book if an open book.
