Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
Brundtland_REPORT_debunked (part 01)
https://ln.syncusercontent.com/mfs-6c08 ... 6c733eeb1e


Brundtland_REPORT_debunked (part 02)

https://ln.syncusercontent.com/mfs-6342 ... 0aec963a25


Brundtland_REPORT_debunked (part 03)

https://ln.syncusercontent.com/mfs-abe5 ... b160647eb4




I previously debunked the Brundtland report on this forum, essentially identifying it as corrupted system dogma sent down to charm the masses using a fallacious appeal to authority, on par with stuff like Agenda 21 and The Georgia Guidestones. There is very little scholarship in the report itself, so any critique of it, good or bad, is an exercise in surface thinking. A promenade on a Sunday afternoon with a parasol and pink dress ... that sorta thing. Nothing serious is offered and nothing serious is received.

Exposition of the paucity of thought contained in the report, then, offers the only real compensation for those who had been falsely led to believe that the report may be of intellectual value. I was sufficiently compensated in the three 30-minute audio files that I created to expose the Brundtland report as nothing more than corrupted output from the corrupted system ... and expose its proponents as surface thinkers who abandoned their greater capacities of thought in favor of their smaller capacities.

With that in mind, don't make the mistake, Gemma, of thinking that any training in the solipsistic popular psychology field of sociopathy amounts to understanding the actual psychological nature of a given individual. You'll need more than pop. psychology literature and attending labels to identify what is actually "wrong", "bad", "lacking", etc. with any given individual.

The label of genius gets tossed around quite a lot, most of the time on a whim or a prejudice. Similarly, the word sociopath gets tossed round, too ... again, on a whim or a prejudice.

Which then doesn't surprise me when Chico throws the label "sociopath" around gratuitously. In his arbitrary determinations, he even calls Hitler an empath. Chico's into whimsy and prejudice. Proof is not his forte; assertion is ... and he then often advances the folly of proof by assertion.

After reading your so-called critique of an uncritical report, the Brundtland Report, I have to wonder where your interests lie ... and how much whimsy and prejudice you are willing to accommodate, in yourself, and in those you support.



Pax

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Sun May 21, 2017 8:55 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
UncleZook wrote:
I previously debunked the Brundtland report on this forum...

:o Hey Zook! Can't you stay on subject? Another deflection to remove the spotlight from your deceptions? You are such a schemer!

UncleZook wrote:
Which then doesn't surprise me when Chico throws the label "sociopath" around gratuitously.

Sorry, Zook, but you have to earn the label. Sam Hunter thought he deserved it (at Inphinet), and I wouldn't give it to him, because he didn't merit it! As usual, I provided evidence why he didn't merit it, just as I provide evidence why you do.

UncleZook wrote:
In his arbitrary determinations, he even calls Hitler an empath.

There's nothing arbitrary about it. It is the result of much research. I have a whole thread with the evidence, if you care to look into it, Professor Zook.

UncleZook wrote:
Chico's into whimsy and prejudice.

Zook's into character assassination -- Chico, Gemma, and anyone else who opposes him.

UncleZook wrote:
Proof is not his forte; assertion is ... and he then often advances the folly of proof by assertion.

Accusing your opponent of your own malfeasance again? You just can't change, can you, Zook. Once a sociopath, always a sociopath. Gratuitous and arbitrary? I think not.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun May 21, 2017 6:36 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
I had a revealing thought about you yesterday, Zook. You know how you are always judging people with your 9/11 litmus test? Here's the most recent example:

UncleZook wrote:
Adam, any negative remark you make against me is a badge of honour. You must know that. You have failed the litmus test of 9/11/2001 so many times now - and you're smart enough to correctly assess the evidence of the Zionist engineered Inside Job - that your best defense is cowardice.

I realized what a hypocrite you are because of the even bigger litmus test you fail. Though 9/11 is indeed an important psy-op in the annals of human manipulation by the ruling sociopaths, it pales in comparison to the Hitler/Holocaust psy-op of World War II. That's a litmus test that you clearly fail! Where is the condemnation of your own gullibility and idiocy? Your own words condemn you, by simply changing the name:

Quote:
Zook, any negative remark you make against me is a badge of honour. You must know that. You have failed the litmus test of Hitler/Holocaust so many times now - and you're smart enough to correctly assess the evidence of the Zionist engineered Inside Job - that your best defense is cowardice.

Hypocrite. Dufus. Sociopath.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun May 21, 2017 6:55 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
I had a revealing thought about you yesterday, Zook. You know how you are always judging people with your 9/11 litmus test? Here's the most recent example:

UncleZook wrote:
Adam, any negative remark you make against me is a badge of honour. You must know that. You have failed the litmus test of 9/11/2001 so many times now - and you're smart enough to correctly assess the evidence of the Zionist engineered Inside Job - that your best defense is cowardice.

I realized what a hypocrite you are because of the even bigger litmus test you fail. Though 9/11 is indeed an important psy-op in the annals of human manipulation by the ruling sociopaths, it pales in comparison to the Hitler/Holocaust psy-op of World War II. That's a litmus test that you clearly fail!


Only a fifth column troll would advance the notion that the truths of Nazi Germany are a litmus test for anything much less integrity. I doubt if you fully understand what a litmus test is, Chico. Litmus paper changes color to indicate acidity or basicity. There is no speculation involved. The solution being tested is either acidic or it is not. For instance, blue litmus paper turns red under acidic conditions but remains blue under basic conditions. A solution is either acidic ... or it is basic ... or it is neutral. It cannot be acidic and basic, acidic and neutral, or basic and neutral at the same time. A solution has one of three states: acid, basic, or neutral.

If Nazi Germany has been truly reported, it has the state (+1). If Nazi Germany has been falsely reported, it has the state (-1). If it can't be determined (or if it is too difficult to determine) whether Nazi Germany has been truly or falsely reported, or if it has been partially truly reported and partially falsely reported, etc. ... then it has the neutral state (0).

That said, the evidence is overwhelming that Hitler was a puppet of the banksters, a strongman installed to create a war theater in Europe, to create division which the banksters could exploit in the maintenance/expansion of their empire. While "overwhelming evidence" is good enough to make conclusions about Hitler and Nazi Germany ... it does not meet the standard of a litmus test.

The litmus standard is an absolute standard. The solution must either be acidic, basic, or neutral (e.g. 50-50 mixture where the concentration of acidic ions exactly equals the concentration of basic ions). The reporting of Nazi Germany has no such exact equivalence between true reporting and false reporting. So the neutral state (0) attained with exact equivalence is not possible in the analysis of Nazi Germany. The other two potential states are also not attainable, because overwhelming evidence either in favor of Hitler's bankster connections or in disfavor ... still cannot attain the states of (+1) or (-1). There will always remain some doubt whether Hitler was fully compliant with the banksters, or mostly compliant. Of course, the Hitler faithful will claim him as a hero and will insist that there was little or no compliance. Indeed, even I who have argued that Hitler was fully compliant with the banksters have some doubt (5-10%??) as to full compliance. Then again, any amount of compliance with the enemy is troubling ... and I have adequately demonstrated - on more than a few occasions here on this forum - that Hitler was mostly if not fully compliant (within 5-10% error).

Was Hitler/Nazi Germany compliant with the banksters? Yes.

Is proving Hitler's compliance sufficient to wield the truths about Nazi Germany as a litmus test against those who have an independent Hitler/Nazi Germany view of history? No. It is only sufficient to expose those who are in contempt of the observable evidence. But because there is sufficient confusion available to crawl under (wrt the reporting of Nazi Germany), even I would be remiss to make any greater conclusions about the character of those in contempt of the observable evidence.

There is no such confusion wrt the attacks of 9/11/2001. There is 100% slam dunk evidence that points to the culprits. Therefore, the 9/11/2011 attacks are indeed a litmus test for one's integrity.

Checkmate.


Quote:
Where is the condemnation of your own gullibility and idiocy? Your own words condemn you, by simply changing the name:

Quote:
Zook, any negative remark you make against me is a badge of honour. You must know that. You have failed the litmus test of Hitler/Holocaust so many times now - and you're smart enough to correctly assess the evidence of the Zionist engineered Inside Job - that your best defense is cowardice.

Hypocrite. Dufus. Sociopath.


The only thing the above comments indicate is your delusional state of being. As well as your penchant for obfuscating; confusing arguments; prevarication; creating uncertainty; gatekeeping; etc. FTR, while there is some confusion about the details of the historical record of Nazi Germany, there is no confusion about Nazi Germany's rise and fall arc ... which was managed every step of the way by the banksters.

Nazi Germany yields no litmus test, but for those that do think it offers a litmus test, the pass mark is at the opposite end, with the conclusion that Hitler and Nazi Germany were creations of the bankster empire, not independent actors.


Pax

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Tue May 23, 2017 6:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
UncleZook wrote:
Was Hitler/Nazi Germany compliant with the banksters? Yes.

Would Hitler have kicked the Rothschild bankers out of Germany if he were "compliant with the banksters"? ( 1 2 3 4 )

Your brainwashing is showing, Zook. And your vacuous arguments are nothing but fancy footwork.



Tap Dance: FAST TAP DANCE STEPS!!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue May 23, 2017 7:42 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:04 am
Posts: 157
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
I have been entertained by the earlier critique of InPHInet, Zook.

Disruptive energies abound in the world at large, often well paid for. (???)

Although, momentarily entertained, I prefer not to embrace any more.

I recently rebooted with a clean slate after a lengthy sabbatical from the internet.

Anything other than purposeful disruption is welcome at InPhiNet as the saga continues...


Yes, I know some is included here, but it may smooth out:

http://www.inphinet.net/threads/random- ... #post-7200

http://www.inphinet.net/threads/random- ... #post-7187


Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:17 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
Rose wrote:
Anything other than purposeful disruption is welcome at InPhiNet as the saga continues...

Let's hope Zook will accept the invitation and bless Inphinet with his words of wisdom. That would be fun to watch, though I would not participate. If I recall correctly, an entire thread at Inphinet where Zook and I debated about Hitler was removed. It's now my policy to avoid participating at forums where my posts are censored. It just doesn't seem worth the effort to write a post only to see your ideas removed because someone in a position of power doesn't approve of them. This has been the problem with every single forum I have contributed to, except for one, namely this forum. United People is the only forum I know of that doesn't censor, and never has. Even Zook will have to admit that all of his posts are still here, and I have no intention of ever allowing any to be censored. The same goes for every other legitimate poster to this forum.

This is really a sad world when freedom of speech is not only rare, but on its way to extinction.

Even worse is how so many people can talk the talk, but then fail to walk the walk. If we wonder why that kind of hypocrisy reigns, we need only point to the deviant psychology that is the common denominator among the powerful people that rule this planet. Theirs is a "trickle-down" psychology that, with the guiding influence of money and mind control, can infect everyone all the way down to the very base of the hierarchical pyramid.

I don't know what Zook's current disposition is. I hope he is active somewhere and doing something good for humanity. The last I saw of him was at UniversalSpectrum.org, where he and Ross (a.k.a. "pod" here) were busy giving each other cautious and comforting massages. It was discomforting to watch, as both share a plethora of sociopathic traits, including exchanging carefully measured favors. This is also classic sociopathic behavior, though most people cannot recognize it, since normal people also do each other favors. The difference is the intent behind the action, with normal people giving without any deliberate accounting, while sociopaths will hold you to every perceived debt they have manipulated you into.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:41 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:04 am
Posts: 157
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
The invitation was not specifically directed to Zook.

I don't recall removing the Hitler thread. It must have been when I was planning to shut down completely. I remember at one point experiencing paranoia about becoming "monitored" as owner of a site sympathetic to anti-semitic or neo-nazi content when this is not the case.

Once a member leaves in an objectionable way, plainly unfriendly to the site, I see no responsibility to maintain their content in public view. Publicly hosted content on my server is a privilege provided to participating members, not a stated right to anyone. Especially, departed antagonistic or deceptive members. Absolutely all content is safe in a non-public archive and can be made available to any previous member who requests to view or copy their archived thread. I have never removed content of a current member. And, I never claimed InPHInet was a normal "forum". I always said it was not. Once a member has stated intent to leave, their content may be compressed and archived. I do not provide a hosting service for departed member's old content. InPHInet is about what is going on now.

That said, I feel certain this response will not suit you. Prior to reading this, I sent a response to your previous unanswered PM at InPHInet.


Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:23 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
Rose wrote:
I don't recall removing the Hitler thread.

Perhaps someone else did it. I talked about it disappearing here.

Rose wrote:
I have never removed content of a current member.

For the past year, I have been a current member at Inphinet, and my posts in the "Was Hitler a sociopath?" thread at Inphinet are gone, because the entire thread was removed. In my mind, that qualifies as removing content of a current member.

Actually, whether the member is current or not is immaterial.

Rose wrote:
That said, I feel certain this response will not suit you.

You are correct. I probably enjoy being censored even less than you do.

Rose wrote:
Publicly hosted content on my server is a privilege provided to participating members, not a stated right to anyone.

Not much for free speech, are you. The privileges actually belong to all -- readers, posters, and administrators. Administrators are privileged to serve others by offering the platform. Posters are privileged to have an audience. Readers, the largest group, are privileged to read the freely expressed opinions of the posters. I am one of those readers, as are you, and I certainly recognize the privilege of reading Zook, Shadowself, Shezbeth, david, Rose, or anyone else who posts their opinions in a forum. I don't always like what they have to say, but I like that they can say it without being censored, and that I can respond without being censored. I certainly object when posts are censored, because I believe free speech is a human right. The administrator of any public forum has a fundamental responsibility to protect that right, as if he were protecting his right to post freely in his own forum. Stephen / Atticus would disagree, and he too would argue that it is a privilege for others to post in his forum, and that he reserves the right to control the content of anyone's posts however he decides. This is the sociopathic mindset, after all. It is one of controlling others differently from how you would want to be controlled.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:05 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:04 am
Posts: 157
Reply with quote
Post Re: 'Their Mind' mindfcuk = ploy to disengage critical think
No, it is NOT a sociopathic mindset, Chico. The issue is that you have a Socialistic mindset and I do not. I do not believe that any more than I believe a person's personal property should be seized by authorities and re-distributed. This is the area at which we are at odds.


Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:23 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.