united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
General Sociopathy: a rational perspective https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1124 |
Page 6 of 13 |
Author: | andywight [ Sat May 10, 2014 4:09 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So disagreeing with you now is "proof" that I'm allying myself with UncleZook, your posts have devolved from retarded to delusional Chicodoodoo!
Don't you hate it when someone produces evidence to back up what they say!
I rest my case!
GROW UP you idiot!
You were asked this back in January of this year:
After giving you every reasonable opportunity to respond "chuck" then posted this:
As to "chuck" being a creditable witness or not would have to be the subject of another discussion, but the FACT REMAINS that Chicodoodoo has still not responded to these legitimate questions which can only point to the fact that Chicodoodoo quite simply is unable to answer them!
As my posting record will clearly show I gave up on this "pathetic little forum" months ago, it wasn't until you started posting disinformation about Bill Still and personnel information on my family and me that I returned! Do you find any part of my last statement confusing you low-life piece of shit?
Not at all and I would advise giving members adequate time to answer your question before accusing them of anything Chicodoodoo! It just makes your premature arguments look desperate and inept! I was educated in the United Kingdom to secondary school level, do you also want my exam results?
I can't believe that your posting this shit, you must really think the people reading this are brain dead! FACT #1 You make the comment that the documentary I posted was a "classic propaganda piece", which by your own definition would mean it contains lies! FACT #2 I simply ask you to point out these lies! FACT #3 You refuse to do this! Conclusion: YOU ARE TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT!!! |
Author: | magamud [ Sat May 10, 2014 7:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective |
Talk about outbursts, but I bet you Andy could fool a lot of people and spin this as a victim. |
Author: | andywight [ Sat May 10, 2014 7:36 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | |||||||||
So you have no comment to make on it's content, only it's author? |
Author: | magamud [ Sat May 10, 2014 7:41 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | |||||||||
A query? What content is that? I was observing your hypocrisy of judging outbursts when you do them in Spades! Care to investigate that? |
Author: | andywight [ Sat May 10, 2014 8:25 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | ||||||||||||||||||
If you mean a question or a request for information about something, then yes but rhetorical! That what is contained within! Very nice! No! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 11, 2014 5:28 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Be as blunt as you want. It won't make any difference in the quantity of truth your statements hold. Yours is an incredibly exaggerated and dismissive statement. So my observations and descriptions of your behavior have no merit? Do you have any idea how selfish that statement is? How arrogant? How deceptive? How manipulative? How dishonest? How sociopathic? No one is qualified to observe and describe the behaviors of Zook except Zook or anyone else whose conclusions match Zook's. All who observe and describe something different than what Zook sees are without merit. Yes, I see.
Yes, my mistake. I almost did it again in my prior post here, but I caught myself this time by checking with the dictionary. My spell checker didn't catch it for some reason yesterday. I apologize for the misspelling. I did mean to use the word "etymology".
Oh, really? After reading thousands of my posts, you are going to claim that I have no regard for the preciseness of meaning? And you call yourself a truth-seeker?
But let me guess -- the observations and descriptions of insect behavior have no merit.
Great lecture coming from one who misspells more often than I do. I've already suggested to you twice in this forum that you spell-check your posts before you submit them (1 2). And this is despite my natural inclination to forgive misspellings (it's an empathy thing that you wouldn't understand), which I often do with your posts.
Observable, measurable, and definable. How can psychology be the study of the soul when "soul" is not quantifiable?
Oh, please! Stop your BS.
Oh, really! Are you going to tell me sociology is a "hard" science and that there is no overlap or connection between individual psychology and the psychology of groups? You are drowning us in BS, Zook!
Oh, another lecture in precision! You're just a wealth of hypocrisy, Zook!
Wait, let me guess -- you are an authority on psychology now that you've Googled it a few times, despite the BS about psychology that you continue to shovel higher and deeper. So you don't recognize authority when it is based on extensive study, experience, and knowledge in the field?
Believe me, it shows.
Doesn't scientific rigor typically benefit from a familiarity of prior work in the field?
What was that Mags was saying about hyperbole? |
Author: | andywight [ Sun May 11, 2014 5:37 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | ||||||||||||||||||
I agree with UncleZook, your observations and descriptions have no merit, as proven in this and many other posts! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 11, 2014 7:16 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How did you come to that idiotic assumption?
Oh, now I see how you come up with these idiotic assumptions! Thanks for the example. Let's analyze it. You think that because I used the words "sociopaths" and "psychopaths" in the same sentence, I must consider them to be the same thing. Andy, assuming that is plain dumb.
What are you talking about? What "basic software programing terms"? Where did I claim to be an expert in sociopathy?
"chuck" is just a Quark cheerleading troll aligned with kmonk (you) and the other sociopaths behind the Quark con-game (digitalindustry, jpmorgansnose, etc.) whose purpose is to character assassinate anyone critical of the Quark crypto-currency. There's no legitimacy in his questions, similar to how there is no legitimacy in your loaded questions. It's the same strategy. I don't have to explain anything to him about nodes or cryptography to point out flaws in the Quark crypto-currency.
Yes, I do. You never proved that any of the information I posted about Bill Still or your family was disinformation. All you did was embark on a vicious campaign of threats and character assassination against me. Why would you do that if you had any truth on your side?
So you left the educational system at about age 16?
Yes, I think that's a very good summary of your usual reasoning process. I've already pointed out that the documentary comes from a dishonest organization, the Church of Scientology, and how the documentary gives support to the Holocaust myth. I can certainly list more lies contained in the film, but we both know it wouldn't be enough to satisfy you, because your goal is not the truth. Your goal is to character assassinate me, which is why you reach your bogus conclusion. Do you really think you are fooling anyone? |
Author: | andywight [ Sun May 11, 2014 7:26 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can you please explain the context to this following comment of yours that I've highlighted in red before I answer your above question?
|
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 11, 2014 8:06 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: General Sociopathy: a rational perspective | ||||||||||||||||||
The context is that, based on a wealth of posts in this forum, both you and Zook have exposed yourselves as sociopaths. But Andy loathes Zook, and Zook loathes Andy, so like oil and water, they won't mix. Having failed to defend their imaginary integrity against public exposure individually, they both suddenly see the necessity to join forces for mutual defense, rather than admit the obvious defeat. All of this was foreseen by Chicodoodoo, who predicted it publicly, much to the consternation of both Zook and Andy. Naturally, both Zook and Andy now have a common interest in discrediting Chicodoodoo. Thus an artificial emulsifier is born to allow oil and water to mix, much like the toxic Corexit that poisoned the entire Gulf of Mexico region after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. |
Page 6 of 13 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |