united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Sociopathy: the goldfish bowl https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1106 |
Page 3 of 3 |
Author: | UncleZook [ Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:42 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Sociopathy: the goldfish bowl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partial solutions. Most real world solutions are partial solutions. So why do you think that we must have whole solutions when problems present themselves? Man's imperfect understandings of the Universe necessarily traps us in the chase of partial solutions. I only have part of the solution, namely, critical awareness of the bankster pyramid and its organization. I don't pretend to have knowledge of the whole solution, if such a thing exists. Perhaps if you step back from your tendency of seeking absolutes and grand unified fields, you might actually avail yourself to the real world, Chico.
It's solvable using the understanding of cycles and the method of partial solutions. Sociopathy is a singularity. Singularities cannot be solved. They must be dealt with by absorbing them into the equation as constants. That way we can still work with the variables. The machinery of the bankster empire is a group of independent variables. It is up to us to seize the independent variables from the sociopaths that are holding them. Then, we may elect to keep the machinery in place on the gamble that empaths can work the variables in to the benefit of humanity. More likely, empaths cannot hold the variables because the equation itself is flawed. So we will have to find a new equation that may (or may not) use some of the old variables ... an equitable equation. We will probably have to greatly diminish the value of the secrecy variable; eliminate the fiat decree and fiat money variables altogether. Modify the organization variable. Etc. In short, the problem is manageable ... and proper management with proper machinery is itself a solution, albeit a partial solution. Some partial solutions are so good that they mimic whole solutions. Indeed, for cyclic structures such as empires, the first partial solution is the ruins of the first empire. The new irritation is the conception of fresh second empire. The new problem is the construction of this second empire. The second partial solution is the ruins of the second empire. Etc. Etc. From Empire1 through Empire2 ... to EmpireN ... a series of partial solutions mimicking the whole solution. As it were.
Have patience, Grasshopper. Go back and read above.
Not if many choose to remain free and independent of the system. For each thinker that sells out, there are many more that buy out. The mathematics vastly favor those that work against the system. Although, I grant that the curtains of Oz would have many believing otherwise.
Yes. But, mostly, in intervals of space than in time. I have poor discernment in local spaces ... but have sharp discernment in global spaces. Local spaces tend to disappear inside the pattern, as it were. Global spaces tend to emerge patterns. I'm nothing if not a pattern-oriented thinker. Of course, being an imperfect human, I do also periodically experience poor discernment in intervals of time, as well ... which is why I frequently get into tete-a-tetes with those I would be better off tickling, or taking to a zoo, or buying three scoops of choklit chip ice cream, or reading about honey jars and Winnie-The_Pooh before bedtime. That sorta thing. But hey, I live by the cycle, so I must die by the cycle ... so I can live again.
I don't dismiss exceptions ... I understand their minor import next to the major significance of the rule. Again, you're pushing this debate towards the exceptions and losing the rule in the process.
Not at all. It's very predictable. Predictable ... as in a series of partial solutions that mimic the whole solution ... but is nothing of the sort. Which is why we give this series of partial solutions its own classification, e.g. management.
Nope. I wouldn't let you mislead the good folks like that. Reality check for Chico: the internet is the new player. The dissemination of information is near instantaneous today. The opportunity for awareness (and critical awareness) has exponential capacity compared to the linear capacity of millennia past. No longer are we stilled by the propaganda of the king's quills, as it were. We discover and share truths outside of royal purview. The main thing required today is discernment. There are levels of discernment ... from poor discernment to rich discernment.
Indeed, they understand that if the bellies run empty, then that will light the spark on the dried timber of awareness. As it were. So while they throw rice into the oceans for corporate bottom lines; and offer cheap, toxic GMOs as part of their culling program ... awareness keeps climbing at its own pace. Slow now. But the pace will pick up as the quality of the controlled food supply begins to take its toll on the health of the people.
Insinuating foolishness is a poor substitute for counterargument. Make the points and defend them. Pax |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:53 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Sociopathy: the goldfish bowl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I didn't say we must have whole solutions. I'm saying that we happen to have one available and we would be wise to avail ourselves of that whole solution. It solves the bankster problem, it solves the Zionist problem, it solves the Vatican problem, it solves the governance (political) problem, and many more. It is a whole solution. Why would you dismiss it in favor of partial solutions?
Sociopathy is the root of the problem. I'm not proposing we solve sociopathy. I'm proposing that we manage it so that it does not become the root of the problem. If you remove the root of the problem, the problem disappears.
Oh, OK. It must be true, because it came from Uncle Zook. What was that saying Andy liked to use? Oh, yeah.... "It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities without your help!"
No, that's not how it happened. I grow tired of your never-ending poor assumptions, oversimplification, and binary thinking. I think it's a waste of time to continue to beat a dead horse. Even your Pax is a deception. |
Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |