A must watch.



Fascinating, illuminating video exposing the many layers of the geopolitical aggression against Syria.

Bander Bush of Saudi Arabia and the Emir of Qatar ... two more minions of the Rothschild brand exposed, as they help destabilize the region for the monied elites of the world and their various profit industries, predominantly the war and natural gas industries.

Pax

ps: Al Jazeera is based in Doha, Qatar <-------------- yet more preponderance that Al Jazeera is a fraud, an intelligence agency concoction and Tokyo-Rose type broadcaster for the bankster empire.

ps2: The Arab Spring is a lie ... it is being fully orchestrated by the same warmongers that wrote the PNAC document (e.g. Zionist Jews) and their middle east minion sheik monkeys (e.g. Bander Bush and EoQ).

ps2: Kudos to Claudia for finding the video!

Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and now Syria are just trees in the forest. So let's zoom out to the next level and look at the entire forest, rather than focusing on individual trees.

• Organized sociopaths are running the show.
• Maintaining or increasing power and control is the goal of the sociopaths.
• Money is the primary tool used by the sociopaths to accomplish that goal.
• The selling of energy is one important source of the money, the purchasing of mercenaries is one important use of the money.

The root of the problem is of course organized sociopaths. Until we have a system in place to identify sociopaths and keep them out of positions of power and control, history will continue to repeat, and the forest will be undermined one tree at a time.

It appears Zook is using the truth to confuse things.


And this is what is exactly happening. It is the same analogy as trying to find the cause of cancer. Our AMA (A very powerful US conglomerate), system cannot connect morality with the "Big Picture."

In line with this narrative, The Corbett report can be used as misdirection from the root of the problem, sociopathy.
I have always suggested this with how deep the false patsy system really is.

I thought Obama was going to charge the Bush Jr. regime with war crimes. And even if he did this, I still suspected that someone or something was still getting away. And I now realize the answer is quite simple.

Its Sociopathy.

Gratuitous attack that has nothing to do with the thread topic. Your backbone is degenerating once again, Mags.



You really thought that Obama was going to charge Bush with war crimes??

And you call yourself a truthseeker?

Factcheck: the US presidency is a puppet throne controlled by the bankster kingmakers. That's one of the first truths that genuine truthseekers uncover even before entering the rabbit hole. That you would have us believe that you think Obama makes any decisions from the throne outside what tie he wears ... is further exposition of your fifth column writing and tribal turnip truck trapping. FWIW, Obama is handled. Formally presidential but functionally peonistic.

Grow that backbone, Mags.

The problem is organization ... not sociopathy. Sociopathy doesn't become dangerous until it becomes organized. Left unorganized, it is merely a nuisance and almost entirely confined to the few that are affected.

That you would call Corbett's excellent understanding of the Syrian antebellum, a misdirection ... is just your masked allegiance to the Zionist chameleon of the bankster empire.

Pax

Utter unmitigated fifth column BS.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria ... are a teak tree grouping in the larger mixed forest. The teak harvesters and merchants design their business models in pursuit of the expensive teak dollar ... they don't step back, scan, and set their cutting machinery indiscriminately against the whole forest to harvest everything from teak to thistle to tangerine to tum tum trees.

They focus on teak.

So if any clown comes by and chuckles about diverging focus by stepping back and observing the whole forest, know that that clown has a bankster carrot up his ass. As it were.



That's correct. Organized sociopaths.



You dropped the qualifier organized. Alas, sociopaths have little or no power (or control) without organization. And I sense that you recognize that fact but are unwilling to admit it openly for that would greatly damage your quack hypothesis that sociopathy is the root cause of the global corruptions. Yes, individual sociopathy is the root cause of many localized effects ... but none of those effects have the global radius of organized sociopathy or its inherent threat to the species.



Not merely money, cupid. Organized control of the money supply via a central bankstering system is the primary tool of the pyramid perches, e.g. to retain and/or increase power.



Sources and targets are both created. They are not found naturally in the environment. As such, they are the derivative results of an organized system of central bankstering. In the absence of such an organization, there is neither source nor target. Indeed, before the central banksters came on the Arabian scene with their organized system (e.g. the JPMorganic destruction of Nicolai Tesla and free energy, the Rockefeller Standard Oil invasion of the desert sands to steal energy, and the erection of puppet sheiks and sheikdoms to manage the theft of energy) ... id est, before the organization, the Arabian desert was merely just another daunting place to gaze at with awe.



Quite generous of you, Chico, to throw the qualifier organized back into the mix. You know, to conceal your earlier mischief when you took it out.

In any event, the teak forest grouping is being undermined by the vacuous pursuit of a vaguely defined subjective concept called sociopathy ... as a substitution for the pursuit of organized sociopathy.

Pax

It appears Zook is using the truth to confuse things.


An observation of your behavior and has everything to do with what you post here.


You not even contemplating this scenario and calling yourself a truth seeker is ironic. Patsy games indeed.

Your such an asshole crook, incriminating me by not knowing the presidency is a puppet? Your a fraud of the worst degree. You incriminate me, stating I do not know Con 101 then convict me of the worst scenario possible. A mindless sheeple? Its interesting that you assassinate me with fundamentals, shock and awe it, then label me as the Enemy/terrorist. That resembles Newspeak to the tee.

Its as if you dont know who I am or have read anything I have wrote. Like a Memory hole. You lie by your omission hoping no one is going to catch your deception. Your in this fantasy land character assassinating everything on this board. You are not even close to a truth seeker. In fact your the opposite.


Lets quote this as evidence of your intelligence. This is not binary by any means, but you suggest it is. How reckless are you? Your like a drunk man stumbling into a room, thinking your sober. And this is a life and death matter! Your dangerous and at the least sloppy and rude.


You are so pathetic its satire. Uncle satire? I would very much like to get more testimony on people who know you Zook. To expose your shallow trash pin mind. Your a Troll....

If you cannot identify sociopathy, how will you ever stop it? You wont, you will just find an endless amount of effects, never knowing the cause. Much how our species operates today.

Pax

In line with your behavior Zook. This statement, would suggest the opposite.

We are in a Patsy system which is hand in hand with false flags. In this sense, I am suggesting the Nazi's fall was a redirection to allow sociopathic eugenics to slip into the US and the worlds infrastructure. A patsy.

So from this view, Zionism is repeating the Nazi narrative. You idgit!

Nuremberg 2?

And you call yourself a thinker? And you wont or cant extrapolate on my points. You rarely do. You only acknowledge them when your backed into a corner with your fraud or need them for your crusade. You reek of narcissism and obfuscation.

What you don't seem to realize, UncleKook, is that another characteristic of sociopaths is that they have an uncanny ability to recognize each other almost on sight. Organizing is a natural consequence of this. Organizing is also a natural consequence of their tiny minority status and the natural persecution they face if they let their true psychopathic colors show. So sociopaths organize naturally. It makes little sense to emphasize their organizing if it is a natural consequence of their pathology. By doing so, you are just confusing people by deliberately obfuscating the real root of the problem, which is sociopathy. Why would you want people to think that unorganized sociopaths are harmless? Are you trying to give sociopaths a positive spin? Could it be that doing so is in your own best interest?


Yes, I sense your desire to reduce this idea to quackery. Sociopaths have used the same strategy in reducing their pathology from the very severe label of "morally insane" to "psychopath" to "sociopath" and finally to the current innocuous label of "Antisocial Personality Disorder". You sociopaths are a determined bunch, aren't you.


Oh, right. You're going to milk this "organized" moniker for all it's worth to prove its worth. Like money doesn't organize naturally. Well here's a clue for you, Einstein. Organized money without the sociopaths is a completely different animal. In non-sociopathic hands, organized money is about raising the tide to lift all boats. It's not about impoverishing the majority to enrich the 1%. So the difference there is not organization. It's sociopathy.


More BS. There is always source and target, but the goals become different in the hands of non-sociopaths compared to sociopaths. That is why the root problem is sociopathy. People organize. What comes out of that organization depends on the psychology of the people doing the organizing. Clearly, your emphasis on organization at the expense of sociopathy is such moral insanity that you must be a socio... er, a victim of Antisocial Personality Disorder.

Are Americans waking up to the deception and manipulation of the ruling sociopaths?

• Ron Paul says gas attack in Syria is a false-flag
• Dissent in the Obama ranks
• Are we sociopaths yet, with no shame?
• Got milk, I mean sociopaths?
• Putin uses common sense, unlike Obama

It appears so and that makes the situation more dangerous. If it becomes cheaper to start murdering people rather then mind controlling them we are going to move into another level of hot tyranny. There are those 5th columns like Zook at work, obfuscating knowledge and distracting unity, but the propaganda is becoming more evident and harder for provocateurs to spew their crap with confidence like spook.