In federal jail?? And that's supposed to prove that he is a genuine prisoner? Your standards of investigation are very low, Mags. You act like you never heard of undercover jailmates.
And no, it''s not a question of me being wrong ... it's a question of the preponderance being overwhelming.
Question begs ... are you open to the preponderance? Being open to Kokesh being controlled opposition amounts to opinion, not preponderated evidence. And it is your opinion only that elevates Kokesh to the position of
hero of our times, nothing more.
Why should Jews be exempted from the scrutiny that accompanies every other community on this planet, when a sociopathic section of that community brings disrepute to the larger community? The Mongols suffered from the rule of the Khans. The Germans suffered from the rule of Hitler. The Japanese Americans suffered for the attack on Pearl Harbor, by being subjugated to life inside internment camps. The Palestinians have been made refugees on their own land after the Zionists stole it using a strategy of terror and more terror ... while, simultaneously, their freedom fighters have been vilified as terrorists by the Zionist occupied media, in a clear case of false flag junk journalism. Etc. Etc.
Yet when the Zionists - who call themselves Jews - do something dastardly ... no one is allowed to rebuke the larger community of Jews without being labeled/libeled as anti-Semitic. Dare I suggest the possibility that the larger community of righteous Jews
have the same rights as the larger community of righteous Mongolians, righteous Germans, righteous Japanese, and righteous Palestinians (each in their own respective situations) ... and not a scintilla more ... without being labeled anti-Semitic for it?
Nay, Mags ... if the larger Jewish community doesn't step up and reject Zionism en masse, then suspicion will naturally follow the entire community. It won't matter how many do-gooders and righteous souls say that it is wrong to broadbrush an entire community for the actions of a subsection, because the mob of gentiles will think like a mob of gentiles ... while the mob of chosen people think like a mob of chosen people. Mob against mob ... a fair battle. Wot?
Why are you then asking me to take the side of the Jewish mob (over the gentile mob) by capitulating to the former mob's rule by the shibboleth of "anti-Semitism"?
Not begrudging usage is not the same as endorsing usage. I personally don't use the term
Jew in the manner that NODISNFO uses it. Not my style. But I won't begrudge someone else who has a different style or vanity or knowledge set . Note that I enquoted the title of this thread.
Having said that, there are good Jews and bad Jews. Just like there are good Hindus and bad Hindus. Just like there are empaths and sociopaths, in general. Let's not get politically correct at the expense of truths and dissolve the substantial divide between the good and the bad. The criminals always want to equate with the law-abiding, no doubt ... but this affection is not reciprocated and should not be. To wit, don't give the bad Jews protective cover by assimilating them with the good Jews ... and if you can't tell the difference or won't ... then you have no legitimate gripe when websites like NODISNFO make no effort to make the same distinctions that you refuse to make.
The Octopus is not so intertwined and amorphous as you make it out to be. The head of the octopus is clearly discernible from any of its tentacles. The fingerprints of globalized/globalizing evil are identifiable ... much more identifiable than any sociopath using genetic tools. Chico can teach me as much as a fool teaches a wise man. Not much more. Once again, the Mongolians didn't carry out 9/11, 4/11, 7/7, the Mumbai attacks, or 3/11 in Sendai ... they didn't orchestrate the antebellums of WW1 or WW2 ... or the Bolshevik revolution ... nor did they undermine China with opium ... or India with colonialism. All the aforementioned acts were committed in the name of the bankster empire; indeed, Britain was only a modest naval empire before the Rothschild brand took over the Bank of England a few centuries ago.
Suffice to say, the bankster empire is currently the one attempting full spectrum dominance ... and I don't see many Mongolian names in its leadership. The convergence of crime and criminal is what it is. Kapiche?
Read my arguments further above and be edified. One isolated Hasidic movement in Israel (e.g Neturei Karta) does not change the argument of general Jewish silence to the racism waged against Arabs. Maybe if the righteous Jews stormed the microphones as eagerly as their Zionist brethren, the rest of the world would hear the differences and make the appropriate distinctions.
As for righteous Americans, I, too, ask ... where the fuck are the righteous Americans after 9/11/2001? I know they are mostly good people. But I also know that they are mostly cowards with neither the will nor the stomach to redress that wrong (genuine truthseekers notwithstanding).
I'm only reporting from the facts of your relative quietude on certain matters and your relative noise on other matters.
Kokesh has done nothing to expose tyranny that wasn't already broadly known. Furthermore, he tried to jeopardize liberty and the Second Amendment by promoting a march into Washington (that was obviously staged by the Zionist agenda for full spectrum dominance).
Me? I seek no balance with the guy ... for he is not a genuine truthseeker, your opinion notwithstanding. People need to shut off pied pipers to exercise intellectualism, not lend full ears to false notes. You're comparing apples and oranges when you bring AJ into the mix. The jury is still out on AJ. AK, by contrast, is cooked and ready for a fork to be stuck in him. Your equation is a good example of lazy intellectualism.
FWIW, your biases are evident. You directed the term anti-Semitism at NODISINFO. You've been conditioned to think like a Zionist. Get some bloodwork done and see if there's not a little Zionist crimson in there.
The only irresponsible person is you, for not recognizing the archer sent down by the king to shoot rubber arrows back at the king ... to gain the confidence of the armed subjects and surreptitiously steer them away from the castle. That design is as old as humans.
You probably believe in other fairy tales, too, if you're so quick to believe in Kokesh. Your discernment is way off ... and your lack even healthy skepticism.
None of the aforementioned is involved with full spectrum dominance. Your obfuscation is duly noted.
Why a specific thread? I've been attacking banksters and Zionists _and_ supporting righteous Jews ... in many posts over the past 2 years. Check the UP archives. Or do you just read them for the titillating material that involves screech owls and Chico's morrisdancing over sociopathy?
I did not bring the condemnation to the common folks, as you allege. I merely don't begrudge NODISINFO for its usage. If there is any condemnation of the common folk on my part, it is about moral cowardice not criminal complicity. But that applies to righteous Jews and righteous Americans alike. Granted, the righteous Jew has more at stake than the righteous American in any false identification of Jew and Zionist. So be it. If one has more to lose than one should be more proactive in fighting that potential loss. Logical and responsible.
Sorry, Mags. I don't believe in redeeming agents of the empire. You just don't get it about Kokesh. Or you refuse to. Nothing I can say or do ... it's a total eclipse of your thought.
The good people are standing up all right ... which means Kokesh's shelf life as a bankster agent is short. You're only entrenching yourself inside the fifth column every time you deny the evidence.
To define the observable as paranoia ... is not unlike redefining war as peace. FWIW, I've put my head on the chopping block by participating in these sundry web forums for about 5 years now. And not as a coward ... but as a full unmitigated widely spoken truthseeker. Partial truths don't impress me as they do you and Chico.
The more important question is of moral cowardice (e.g. you and Chico) ... not staged courage (e.g. Kokesh). I've already moved beyond Kokesh. I may have to move beyond you and Chico once I'm fully convinced that you guys are fifth columnists. Right now, there's a slight fog in this area.
Your premise is a false one, namely, that Kokesh is a genuine truthseeker and agent of change. The derivative stuff is a house built on a deck of cards ... and will fall at the slightest wind. Yours had fallen a long time ago ... and you keep building it up. Says a lot about you.
Show me the proof that the Vatican or China pulled off 9/11/2001 and the other aforementioned false flags around the globe .. and I may change my mind and conclude that the Vatican (or China) - and not the Zion-founding Rothschild brand - controls the bankster empire and the reins of full spectrum dominance. Otherwise, continue bleating much ado about nothing.
[/quote]
I made my case. No sense belaboring it.
Pax
