More great stuff from Webster Tarpley ...



Gets a whole bunch of skunks with his analytical net ... including Adrian Lamo, Glen Greenwald, Snowden, etc.

My apologies, again, to genetic skunks for their having to share the label with the above sociopaths.

Pax

Question everything, dismiss nothing.

All our freedom leaders have concepts on where evil comes from and then attack it from their position. Even though, sociopathy is the common core amongst them. This is because cause stems from our own lack of knowledge on who we are. What good are appearances when the very motar is sand.

This is not even considering the power of deception, to keep us divided with titles.

Yes! "From their position" meaning from their perspective and from their understanding, which is almost always woefully inadequate.

Another great observation, Mags! Humanity makes this mistake continually. We fail to see the root of the problem, which is a particular form of deviant psychology known as sociopathy. Instead we attack the results of sociopathy, the symptoms, all the while ignoring the underlying disease which produces those symptoms. That's why we always fail. We try to correct the fallout of the evil acts rather than determining where the evil really comes from and dealing with it directly.

All I can say ... is that you two polemical cherubs will continue to wax on the human condition - as humans have been doing without any great progress since first sheltering in caves - until the cows come home ... and the chickens to roosts, the pigs to sties, the ducks to ponds, the goats to barns ... and the bankster empire to full spectrum dominance.

This thread is about Wikileaks (Tarpley's perspective) ... not polemics. But of course, you have the right to obfuscate without consequence. After all, one of you owns the forum. Call it owner's privilege.

Once again ... it's not about sociopathy ... it's about secrecy, organization, and fiat money. The square pyramid design of things proves it's not about sociopathy ... for the sociopaths in the Zionist hierarchy are a minority.

The Stockholm Syndrome points to normal humans turning into robots ... and doing things they wouldn't do on their own. Most Zionists are themselves victims of the Stockholm Syndrome. But they are still culpable for the crimes they inflict ... just as the Syndromites are sill culpable for any torture they inflict (albeit with some mitigation because they would not have inflicted without outside suggestion).


Pax

I agree Zook! If we can decipher it the bankster empire would cease to exist. This makes it all about polemics. Not some wild goose chase over a minor detail of the big picture.



If one owns a forum is it assumed he will obfuscate?


Its all about sociopathy as secrecy, organization and fiat money are subsets of it. Use Gestalt analytics.


Titles are the big Con Zook with ready made patsies to look spontaneous. The world thought they destroyed evil, when they beat the Nazis. How wrong were they? It was actually the catalyst for evil to take over the world.

Polemics is the field of argument ... that includes good and bad arguments, valid and invalid arguments.

So it's not about polemics but about observations, patterns, documents ... and ultimately, FACTS and FACT DERIVATIVES.

Polemics is the wild goose that runs away from the bankster empire.


It is assumed that the owner has the power to obfuscate without consequence. The actual record of obfuscation makes it a good assumption.



No. Organization is not a subset. Sociopaths sometimes work alone.

Secrecy is not a subset. Sociopaths sometimes work out in the open.

Fiat money is not a subset. The move away from a barter system necessitated an accounting system. There were instances of fiat money that actually worked closer to the founding concept. Colonial Scripp in the American colonial century, for example, was a form of fiat money that actually delivered a degree of freedom from the bankster's fiat money and monopoly.



Gestalt analytics does not make sociopathy the primary plinth beneath the bankster empire. Sociopaths inside the bankster pyramid may be the directing agents ... but they are vastly outnumbered by nonsociopaths who for various reasons (e.g. Stockholm Syndrome) enable the sociopaths to rule without their free consent. Consent is often manufactured through false promises, manipulations, deceptions, base denominators, bribes, etc.

Focusing on sociopathy does nothing to resist the bankster empire or its corruptions. Attacking secrecy, attacking the bankster organization, attacking fiat money ... that's where the meaningful action must be applied.

We can assume that sociopaths run the show without loss of meaning. But then, to point all discussion towards sociopathy (which likely won't be cured for millennia and a great deal of evolution yet - and that's the sad state of the human condition, FBOFW) ... is it to flush all tangible action against the bankster empire and its corruptions into a bottomless void. Tangible action such as exposition of crimes, inculpation in conspiracies, indictment of crimes, punishment of crimes, dismantling of power pyramid, decentralization of power structures, size limitations on power structures, etc. etc.

Keep sociopathy alive by making it a celebrity of sorts ... and destroy humanity in the process.



The banksters/Zionists funded Nazism. They funded Communism. They funded the Mujaheedin. Etc. Etc. If the titles such as banksters/Zionists offends you, perhaps you should question your own perspective on things. After all, identifying the perps and bringing them into account is usually the first step in the pursuit of things like justice,
fairness, freedom, liberty, ethics, security, transparency, etc. ... all great principles that dress good on paper and address good at the lectern ... but nothing beats the actual exercise thereof.


Pax

Secrecy, hierarchy (inequality), the corruption of money into an instrument of power and control -- all of these are direct symptoms of sociopathy. It's amazing you can't see it.


Two completely false statements. You should be ashamed to lie like that, but guess what? Sociopaths don't feel shame. Nor do they take the responsibility to correct their mistakes.


The Stockholm Syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with them. Sociopaths are not susceptible to this phenomenon, since they are lacking empathy and sympathy. I see you have a distorted understanding of the Stockholm Syndrome, Zook. This would make perfect sense if you have low levels of empathy and sympathy, which a sociopath would. I would like to emphasize that I am not gaslighting here, but simply describing the reality of the circumstances I am observing. There is no intent to deceive or manipulate. There is only the intent to describe the situation truthfully. I doubt you will be able to see the difference, however.

Mea culpa ... not Stockholm Syndrome ... I was thinking of the Milgram Experiment.

But Chico's intent to deceive is in full flight.

I hope the remaining readers of this forum realize what a delusional mind Chico has developed. And that's a best case scenario. I must now also entertain the possibility that Chico is projecting his own afflictions of narcissim, ego, vanity, self-righteousness, etc. ... on anyone he deems is against him.

Proof?

Well, I made an honest mistake by interchanging Stockholm Syndrome with Milgram Experiment. Yet Chico tries
to parlay my mistake into evidence of me being a sociopath. He's just making things up now. Anything that doesn't agree with Chico is fair game to be redefined as sociopathic and anyone, a sociopath. Not just agree with Chico ... even if you make an honest mistake, he'll get you with the sociopath label and proceed to explain with expert insight that the event that prompted him to label you a sociopath (e.g. an honest nistake) is a feature of sociopathy. So we now have honest mistakes as evidence of sociopathy, in Chico's World.

FWIW, I once confused Howard Zinn for Steven Lendeman (wrt 9/11/2001) ... and he tried to parlay that into Zook's legerdemain after being caught lying about Lendeman. (Or was it lying about Zinn??, can't remember which of those left gatekeepers was the target of my ire and eventual mistake. It's in the archives, anyways.)

Chico's penchant for innuendo has gotten him astray of the facts before ... and it's probably also a factor in his poor discernment. It's pathetic, actually.


Pax